From: Thomas Walker Lynch Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:11:52 +0000 (+0000) Subject: . X-Git-Url: https://git.reasoningtechnology.com/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d51efb5e06c891631facf0a571f6cb84eceea90d;p=TM-2026 . --- diff --git a/document/book/TM-2026.html b/document/book/TM-2026.html index 4f4cbc7..047265d 100644 --- a/document/book/TM-2026.html +++ b/document/book/TM-2026.html @@ -452,11 +452,12 @@ The presumed dialectic -

The pattern of a thesis met by its opposite and settled in a third position is commonly credited to Hegel; however, it was Fichte who first articulated it, and it was Heinrich Moritz Chalybäus who fixed the three names upon it in a popular history of 1837. - Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Grundlage der gesammten Wissenschaftslehre (Leipzig, 1794), §§1−3. Heinrich Moritz Chalybäus, Historische Entwicklung der speculativen Philosophie von Kant bis Hegel (Dresden, 1837). Hegel’s own term is Aufhebung, in which a position is cancelled, preserved, and raised at once. The three-step formula is not in his vocabulary, and scholars of Hegel are quick to say so. - The approach is easy to reach for and it is habit-forming. Our courtrooms, legislatures, and debating societies set rules for adversarial contest, and build in the expectation of progress by picking winners.

+

Our courtrooms, legislatures, and debating societies set rules for adversarial contest, and this instills our culture with the expectation that progress is made by picking winners. However each dialectic implies a deeper issue. + The pattern of a thesis met by its opposite and settled in a third position is commonly credited to Hegel, and it is not his. Fichte set out the triad in the Grundlage der gesammten Wissenschaftslehre (Leipzig, 1794), §§1−3, and Heinrich Moritz Chalybäus fixed the three names upon it in the Historische Entwicklung der speculativen Philosophie von Kant bis Hegel (Dresden, 1837), from which it passed into general use. Hegel’s own term is Aufhebung, in which a position is cancelled, preserved, and raised at once, and scholars of Hegel are quick to say that the three-step formula is not in his vocabulary. + Say two people debate if the room is too hot, or too cold, implied is the existence of temperature. Sometimes the deeper understanding resolves the debate by encompassing both sides. +

-

There is an ancient story from India telling of blind men and an elephant. One takes hold of the trunk and reports a snake, one the ear and reports a fan, one the leg and reports a pillar. So then, if these men had a debate, who would the judge pick as the winner? Or should we accept mutually contradictory points of view as being indicative of a deeper truth? Not one synthesized, but one discovered.

+

There is an ancient story from India telling of blind men and an elephant. One takes hold of the trunk and reports a snake, one the ear and reports a fan, one the leg and reports a pillar. So then, if these men had a debate, who would the judge pick as the winner? Or should we accept mutually contradictory points of view as being indicative of a deeper truth? Perhaps not one synthesized, but one discovered.

After the Athenian Academy declined, the transmission of Greek thought fractured. Western Europe retained fragments of Aristotle’s logic while the corpus migrated east, carried by Syriac Christians to eighth-century Arabic-speaking scholars who rendered Aristotle, Euclid, and Galen into Arabic. The problem those scholars faced was fitting philosophical demonstration to Islamic faith. Hunayn ibn Ishaq (809−873) and his circle drove the translation movement under Abbasid patronage. The arriving texts contained Aristotle layered with late-antique commentary and Neoplatonic adaptations circulating under his name, notably the Theology of Aristotle (an adaptation of Plotinus). See “Greek Sources in Arabic and Islamic Philosophy,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.